Griffon Grammar Feedback
Griffon Grammar Feedback
A thread to point out errors in the nature of typos or awkward sentence structure here.
Re: Griffon Grammar Feedback
So should I be worried about the lack of posts here or has feedback been posted elsewhere?
Anyway, I want to nitpick that Larry Dixon and Mercedes Lackey essay(or whatever one calls it) feel more like a foreword, then a start of a chapter.
While being a great tone setter it really has nothing to do with the rest of the chapter.
Anyway, I want to nitpick that Larry Dixon and Mercedes Lackey essay(or whatever one calls it) feel more like a foreword, then a start of a chapter.
While being a great tone setter it really has nothing to do with the rest of the chapter.
Re: Griffon Grammar Feedback
It is a foreword.
Re: Griffon Grammar Feedback
I found an error in the main griffon entry under low light vision it mentions hippogriffs not griffons.
Edit: noticed something else odd if this part is right "Ponykind: Griff ons qualify as ponykind for all eff ects,
feats, and archetypes, to be used by or against the griffon." then why does the hippogriff need this line "Ponykind: Hippogriffs qualify as ponykind for all effects, feats, and archetypes, to be used by or against the hippogriff.
Griffon: Hippogriff s qualify as griffon for all eff ects, feats, and archetypes,
to be used by or against the hippogriff." That would seem redundant then.
Edit: noticed something else odd if this part is right "Ponykind: Griff ons qualify as ponykind for all eff ects,
feats, and archetypes, to be used by or against the griffon." then why does the hippogriff need this line "Ponykind: Hippogriffs qualify as ponykind for all effects, feats, and archetypes, to be used by or against the hippogriff.
Griffon: Hippogriff s qualify as griffon for all eff ects, feats, and archetypes,
to be used by or against the hippogriff." That would seem redundant then.
Re: Griffon Grammar Feedback
Hippogriffs count as both ponykind and griffon for things that care about one or the other. That is intentional. I fixed the other one though, good catch!
Re: Griffon Grammar Feedback
Well you see that first part was in the griffon box saying they count as ponykind though so that's why I was thinking it was off
Re: Griffon Grammar Feedback
You were correct. I fixed this. Thanks for pointing it out!
- chimeforest
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Sat Apr 09, 2016 8:31 am
Re: Griffon Grammar Feedback
On page 17, under favored class options, Druid and Summoner should be in bold.
On a side note, the alternative racial traits on the same page are not in the griffon herolab extension (That's part of how I came to notice the above error)
On a side note, the alternative racial traits on the same page are not in the griffon herolab extension (That's part of how I came to notice the above error)
Re: Griffon Grammar Feedback
Foul thread necromancy! But good to know.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests