Griffon Grammar Feedback

Get sneak peaks at parts of the new book, and contribute to related discussions.
User avatar
David
Site Admin
Posts: 2137
Joined: Fri Aug 23, 2013 3:52 pm

Griffon Grammar Feedback

Postby David » Mon Jan 12, 2015 7:48 am

A thread to point out errors in the nature of typos or awkward sentence structure here.

Tentomon4
Posts: 5
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2015 1:15 pm
Location: Sweden

Re: Griffon Grammar Feedback

Postby Tentomon4 » Wed Feb 04, 2015 1:20 pm

So should I be worried about the lack of posts here or has feedback been posted elsewhere?

Anyway, I want to nitpick that Larry Dixon and Mercedes Lackey essay(or whatever one calls it) feel more like a foreword, then a start of a chapter.
While being a great tone setter it really has nothing to do with the rest of the chapter.

User avatar
David
Site Admin
Posts: 2137
Joined: Fri Aug 23, 2013 3:52 pm

Re: Griffon Grammar Feedback

Postby David » Wed Feb 04, 2015 1:24 pm

It is a foreword.

Tentomon4
Posts: 5
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2015 1:15 pm
Location: Sweden

Re: Griffon Grammar Feedback

Postby Tentomon4 » Thu Feb 05, 2015 11:48 am

Good.

Avorin
Posts: 2
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2015 2:48 am

Re: Griffon Grammar Feedback

Postby Avorin » Wed Mar 04, 2015 2:52 am

I found an error in the main griffon entry under low light vision it mentions hippogriffs not griffons.


Edit: noticed something else odd if this part is right "Ponykind: Griff ons qualify as ponykind for all eff ects,
feats, and archetypes, to be used by or against the griffon." then why does the hippogriff need this line "Ponykind: Hippogriffs qualify as ponykind for all effects, feats, and archetypes, to be used by or against the hippogriff.

Griffon: Hippogriff s qualify as griffon for all eff ects, feats, and archetypes,
to be used by or against the hippogriff." That would seem redundant then.

User avatar
David
Site Admin
Posts: 2137
Joined: Fri Aug 23, 2013 3:52 pm

Re: Griffon Grammar Feedback

Postby David » Wed Mar 04, 2015 6:40 am

Hippogriffs count as both ponykind and griffon for things that care about one or the other. That is intentional. I fixed the other one though, good catch!

Avorin
Posts: 2
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2015 2:48 am

Re: Griffon Grammar Feedback

Postby Avorin » Fri Mar 06, 2015 6:02 am

Well you see that first part was in the griffon box saying they count as ponykind though so that's why I was thinking it was off

User avatar
David
Site Admin
Posts: 2137
Joined: Fri Aug 23, 2013 3:52 pm

Re: Griffon Grammar Feedback

Postby David » Fri Mar 06, 2015 6:11 am

You were correct. I fixed this. Thanks for pointing it out!

User avatar
chimeforest
Posts: 3
Joined: Sat Apr 09, 2016 8:31 am

Re: Griffon Grammar Feedback

Postby chimeforest » Sat Apr 09, 2016 8:44 am

On page 17, under favored class options, Druid and Summoner should be in bold.

On a side note, the alternative racial traits on the same page are not in the griffon herolab extension (That's part of how I came to notice the above error)

User avatar
David
Site Admin
Posts: 2137
Joined: Fri Aug 23, 2013 3:52 pm

Re: Griffon Grammar Feedback

Postby David » Sat Apr 09, 2016 10:05 am

Foul thread necromancy! But good to know.


Return to “Drawing Board”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests